| Title |
Mobile Health Technology to Improve Care for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yutao Guo, Deirdre A. Lane, Limin Wang, Hui Zhang, Hao Wang, Wei Zhang, Jing Wen, Yunli Xing, Fang Wu, Yunlong Xia, Tong Liu, Fan Wu, Zhaoguang Liang, Fan Liu, Yujie Zhao, Rong Li, Xin Li, Lili Zhang, Jun Guo, Girvan Burnside, Yundai Chen, Gregory Y.H. Lip, mAF-App II Trial Investigators, Yutao Guo, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Deirdre A. Lane, Yundai Chen, Liming Wang, Jens Eckstein, G Neil Thomas, Liu Tong, Feng Mei, Liu Xuejun, Li Xiaoming, Shan Zhaoliang, Shi Xiangming, Zhang Wei, Xing Yunli, Wen Jing, Wu Fan, Yang Sitong, Jin Xiaoqing, Yang Bo, Bai Xiaojuan, Jiang Yuting, Liu Yangxia, Song Yingying, Tan Zhongju, Yang Li, Luan Tianzhu, Niu Chunfeng, Zhang Lili, Li Shuyan, Wang Zulu, Xv Bing, Liu Liming, Jin Yuanzhe, Xia Yunlong, Chen Xiaohong, Wu Fang, Zhong Lina, Sun Yihong, Jia Shujie, Li Jing, Li Nan, Li Shijun, Liu Huixia, Li Rong, Liu Fan, Ge Qingfeng, Guan Tianyun, Wen Yuan, Li Xin, Ren Yan, Chen Xiaoping, Chen Ronghua, Shi Yun, Zhao Yulan, Shi Haili, Zhao Yujie, Wang Quanchun, Sun Weidong, Wei Lin, Esther Chan, Shan Guangliang, Yao Chen, Zong Wei, Chen Dandi, Han Xiang, Xu Anding, Fan Xiaohan, Yu Ziqiang, Gu Xiang, Ge Fulin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 15% |
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 294 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 154 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2023.
All research outputs
#647,656
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,667
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,504
of 397,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#43
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.