| Title |
Reply Observations From the Huawei Heart Study Using Photoplethysmography-Based Smart Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yutao Guo, Tong Liu, Yundai Chen, Gregory Y.H. Lip, MAFA II Investigators |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,058,366
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,617
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,498
of 383,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#77
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.