↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication
Published in
Mammalian Genome, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00335-011-9386-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert K. Wayne, Bridgett M. vonHoldt

Abstract

We review the underlying principles and tools used in genomic studies of domestic dogs aimed at understanding the genetic changes that have occurred during domestication. We show that there are two principle modes of evolution within dogs. One primary mode that accounts for much of the remarkable diversity of dog breeds is the fixation of discrete mutations of large effect in individual lineages that are then crossed to various breed groupings. This transfer of mutations across the dog evolutionary tree leads to the appearance of high phenotypic diversity that in actuality reflects a small number of major genes. A second mechanism causing diversification involves the selective breeding of dogs within distinct phenotypic or functional groups, which enhances specific group attributes such as heading or tracking. Such progressive selection leads to a distinct genetic structure in evolutionary trees such that functional and phenotypic groups cluster genetically. We trace the origin of the nuclear genome in dogs based on haplotype-sharing analyses between dogs and gray wolves and show that contrary to previous mtDNA analyses, the nuclear genome of dogs derives primarily from Middle Eastern or European wolves, a result more consistent with the archeological record. Sequencing analysis of the IGF1 gene, which has been the target of size selection in small breeds, further supports this conclusion. Finally, we discuss how a black coat color mutation that evolved in dogs has transformed North American gray wolf populations, providing a first example of a mutation that appeared under domestication and selectively swept through a wild relative.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 317 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 19%
Researcher 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 14%
Student > Master 42 13%
Other 13 4%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 79 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 6%
Environmental Science 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 88 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,102,384
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#7
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,770
of 258,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.