↓ Skip to main content

RSRC1 loss-of-function variants cause mild to moderate autosomal recessive intellectual disability

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RSRC1 loss-of-function variants cause mild to moderate autosomal recessive intellectual disability
Published in
Brain, March 2020
DOI 10.1093/brain/awaa070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Scala, Majid Mojarrad, Saima Riazuddin, Karlla W Brigatti, Zineb Ammous, Julie S Cohen, Heba Hosny, Muhammad A Usmani, Mohsin Shahzad, Sheikh Riazuddin, Valentina Stanley, Atiye Eslahi, Richard E Person, Hasnaa M Elbendary, Anne M Comi, Laura Poskitt, Vincenzo Salpietro, Queen Square Genomics, Jill A Rosenfeld, Katie B Williams, Dana Marafi, Fan Xia, Marta Biderman Waberski, Maha S Zaki, Joseph Gleeson, Erik Puffenberger, Henry Houlden, Reza Maroofian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 4 20%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Neuroscience 4 20%
Philosophy 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,074,515
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#6,038
of 7,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,601
of 369,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#76
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.