↓ Skip to main content

Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study
Published in
Critical Care, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2826-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana Madotto, Emanuele Rezoagli, Tài Pham, Marcello Schmidt, Bairbre McNicholas, Alessandro Protti, Rakshit Panwar, Giacomo Bellani, Eddy Fan, Frank van Haren, Laurent Brochard, John G. Laffey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Other 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,276,859
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,979
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,956
of 398,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.