| Title |
Yoga-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Ambalam M. Chandrasekaran, Kalpana Singh, Bishav Mohan, Kaushik Chattopadhyay, Davinder S. Chadha, Prakash C. Negi, Prabhavathi Bhat, Kanchanahalli S. Sadananda, Vamadevan S. Ajay, Kavita Singh, Pradeep A. Praveen, Raji Devarajan, Dimple Kondal, Divya Soni, Poppy Mallinson, Subhash C. Manchanda, Kushal Madan, Alun D. Hughes, Nishi Chathurvedi, Ian Roberts, Shah Ebrahim, Kolli S. Reddy, Nikhil Tandon, Stuart Pocock, Ambuj Roy, Sanjay Kinra, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Sanjay Kinra, Nikhil Tandon, Subhash Chand Manchanda, Ajay Vamadevan S, Kolli Srinath Reddy, Ian Roberts, Deepak Bhatnagar, Vivek Chaturvedi, Pablo Perel, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Sanjay Kinra, Neil Poulter, S. Harikrishnan, Ravindra M. Pandey, S. Harikrishnan, Amitava Banerjee, Paramjit Gill, Davinder Singh Chadha, Ambuj Roy, Neil Bardoloi, Ambuj Roy, Subhash Chand Manchanda, Bishav Mohan, Prakash Chand Negi, Sanjeev Asotra, Prabhavati Bhat, Manjunath C. Nanjappa, Kanchanahalli S. Sadananda, M.R. Prasad, Raghava Sarma, K.U. Natrajan, Srikumar Swaminathan, Ravindra K. Tongia, S. Natarajan, Bhaskara Rao, Calambur Narasimhan, Jabir Abdullakutty, Srinivas Mallya, Anil R. Jain, Sudhir R. Naik, Nagraj Desai, Sunil Kumar, Shankar Patil, Satish Patil, Davinder Singh Chadha, Sharad Chandra, Nagamalesh U. Madappa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 20 | 30% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 18% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 306 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 152 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 157 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#826,544
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,070
of 16,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,970
of 397,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#57
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.