You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete genome sequence of Tsukamurella paurometabola type strain (no. 33T)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.1894556 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Christine Munk, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Matt Nolan, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Marcel Huntemann, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D. Jeffries, Thomas Brettin, Montri Yasawong, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Johannes Sikorski, Markus Göker, John C. Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk |
| Abstract |
Tsukamurella paurometabola corrig. (Steinhaus 1941) Collins et al. 1988 is the type species of the genus Tsukamurella, which is the type genus to the family Tsukamurellaceae. The species is not only of interest because of its isolated phylogenetic location, but also because it is a human opportunistic pathogen with some strains of the species reported to cause lung infection, lethal meningitis, and necrotizing tenosynovitis. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Tsukamurella and the first genome sequence of a member of the family Tsukamurellaceae. The 4,479,724 bp long genome contains a 99,806 bp long plasmid and a total of 4,335 protein-coding and 56 RNA genes, and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#720
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,912
of 127,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.