You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete genome sequence of Weeksella virosa type strain (9751T)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.1603927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elke Lang, Hazuki Teshima, Susan Lucas, Alla Lapidus, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Matt Nolan, Jan-Fang Cheng, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Mikhailova, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amrita Pati, Roxane Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D. Jeffries, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Markus Kopitz, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Brian J. Tindall, John C. Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C. Kyrpides |
| Abstract |
Weeksella virosa Holmes et al. 1987 is the sole member and type species of the genus Weeksella which belongs to the family Flavobacteriaceae of the phylum Bacteroidetes. Twenty-nine isolates, collected from clinical specimens provided the basis for the taxon description. While the species seems to be a saprophyte of the mucous membranes of healthy man and warm-blooded animals a causal relationship with disease has been reported in a few instances. Except for the ability to produce indole and to hydrolyze Tween and proteins such as casein and gelatin, this aerobic, non-motile, non-pigmented bacterial species is metabolically inert in most traditional biochemical tests. The 2,272,954 bp long genome with its 2,105 protein-coding and 76 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#720
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,253
of 120,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.