↓ Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of Calditerrivibrio nitroreducens type strain (Yu37-1T)

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete genome sequence of Calditerrivibrio nitroreducens type strain (Yu37-1T)
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, March 2011
DOI 10.4056/sigs.1523807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Pitluck, Johannes Sikorski, Ahmet Zeytun, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxane Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D. Jeffries, John C. Detter, Evelyne Brambilla, Oliver D. Ngatchou Djao, Manfred Rohde, Stefan Spring, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Miriam Land

Abstract

Calditerrivibrio nitroreducens Iino et al. 2008 is the type species of the genus Calditerrivibrio. The species is of interest because of its important role in the nitrate cycle as nitrate reducer and for its isolated phylogenetic position in the Tree of Life. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the third complete genome sequence of a member of the family Deferribacteraceae. The 2,216,552 bp long genome with its 2,128 protein-coding and 50 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#248
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,051
of 120,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.