You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trait integration and functional differentiation among co‐existing plant species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Botany, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ajb2.1451 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia I. Burton, Steven S. Perakis, J. Renée Brooks, Klaus J. Puettmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 47% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,299,164
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#683
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,740
of 376,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.