You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of a screening method for the detection of colistin-resistant E. coli containing mcr-1 in feral swine feces
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105892 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey C Chandler, Alan B Franklin, Sarah N Bevins, Kevin T Bentler, Jonas Bonnedahl, Christina A Ahlstrom, Bledar Bisha, Susan A Shriner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 29% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,793,181
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#1,457
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,257
of 390,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.