You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Missing data in cross-sectional networks – An extensive comparison of missing data treatment methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Networks, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.02.004 |
| Authors |
Robert W. Krause, Mark Huisman, Christian Steglich, Tom Snijders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,624,127
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#168
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,138
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.