↓ Skip to main content

The customer is always right? Subjective target symptoms and treatment preferences in patients with psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The customer is always right? Subjective target symptoms and treatment preferences in patients with psychosis
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00406-016-0694-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Moritz, Fabrice Berna, Susanne Jaeger, Stefan Westermann, Matthias Nagel

Abstract

Clinicians and patients differ concerning the goals of treatment. Eighty individuals with schizophrenia were assessed online about which symptoms they consider the most important for treatment, as well as their experience with different interventions. Treatment of affective and neuropsychological problems was judged as more important than treatment of positive symptoms (p < 0.005). While most individuals had experience with Occupational and Sports Therapy, only a minority had received Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Family Therapy, and Psychoeducation with family members before. Patients appraised Talk, Psychoanalytic, and Art Therapy as well as Metacognitive Training as the most helpful treatments. Clinicians should carefully take into consideration patients' preferences, as neglect of consumers' views may compromise outcome and adherence to treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 67 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 79 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,158,531
of 24,844,992 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#125
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,325
of 341,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,844,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.