| Title |
Safety and Feasibility of PARP1/2 Imaging with 18F-PARPi in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3484 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heiko Schöder, Paula Demétrio De Souza França, Reiko Nakajima, Eva Burnazi, Sheryl Roberts, Christian Brand, Milan Grkovski, Audrey Mauguen, Mark P. Dunphy, Ronald A. Ghossein, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Jason S. Lewis, Joseph A. O'Donoghue, Ian Ganly, Snehal G. Patel, Nancy Y. Lee, Thomas Reiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#427,072
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#217
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,747
of 385,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#10
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.