| Title |
Topographically modified tree-ring chronologies as a potential means to improve paleoclimate inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-010-0005-5 |
| Authors |
Andrew G. Bunn, Malcolm K. Hughes, Matthew W. Salzer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,848,216
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,321
of 5,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,495
of 181,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#43
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.