| Title |
Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse repair with the Prolift® and Elevate® vaginal mesh procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-1830-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory P. McLennan, Larry T. Sirls, Kim A. Killinger, Dmitriy Nikolavsky, Judith A. Boura, Melissa C. Fischer, Kenneth M. Peters |
| Abstract |
We compared the operative and immediate postoperative experience of the trocar-based Prolift and non-trocar-based Elevate techniques used to repair vaginal prolapse. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 62% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#706
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,238
of 180,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#20
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.