↓ Skip to main content

自律型致死兵器システム(LAWS)に関するロボット法的視点からの考察

Overview of attention for article published in IEICE ESS Fundamentals Review, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
自律型致死兵器システム(LAWS)に関するロボット法的視点からの考察
Published in
IEICE ESS Fundamentals Review, January 2020
DOI 10.1587/essfr.13.3_217
Authors

新保 史生

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,518,452
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from IEICE ESS Fundamentals Review
#33
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,504
of 479,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEICE ESS Fundamentals Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them