↓ Skip to main content

Current evidence that exercise can increase the number of adult stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 296)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Current evidence that exercise can increase the number of adult stem cells
Published in
Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10974-012-9302-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Macaluso, K. H. Myburgh

Abstract

The number of adult stem cells (ASCs) is very small, limiting the regenerative potential of tissues. One of the most studied ASCs in humans is the satellite cell (SC), which proliferates and increases pool size under exercise stress and muscle damage. This review examines the growth factor response to specific types of exercise to show the potential of exercise to stimulate not only SC self-renewal, but also other ASCs. We postulate that the same factors that stimulate a high proliferation of SCs in skeletal muscle after physical exercise should also stimulate the proliferation of ASCs in the tissue in which they reside, such as heart, bone, liver and etc. Regular exercise should be promoted, not only for disease prevention, but to maintain a high ASCs reserve and progenitor cell potential for rapid activation in response to future stressors and damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Sports and Recreations 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,874,290
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#4
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,245
of 166,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them