↓ Skip to main content

Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT for evaluation in patients with malignant lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Nuclear Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT for evaluation in patients with malignant lymphoma
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12149-012-0619-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayoshi Shinya, Soichiro Fujii, Shoji Asakura, Toshitaka Taniguchi, Kotaro Yoshio, Aierken Alafate, Shuhei Sato, Tadashi Yoshino, Susumu Kanazawa

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dual-time-point (DTP) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with semiquantitative analyses for the initial staging in patients with malignant lymphoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 22%
Other 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,750,802
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#98
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,698
of 167,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.