| Title |
Triage Considerations for Patients Referred for Structural Heart Disease Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic An ACC/SCAI Position Statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pinak B. Shah, Frederick G.P. Welt, Ehtisham Mahmud, Alistair Phillips, Neal S. Kleiman, Michael N. Young, Matthew Sherwood, Wayne Batchelor, Dee Dee Wang, Laura Davidson, Janet Wyman, Sabeeda Kadavath, Molly Szerlip, James Hermiller, David Fullerton, Saif Anwaruddin, American College of Cardiology and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 45% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#558,239
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#111
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,423
of 400,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#3
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.