| Title |
Association between National Early Warning Scores in primary care and clinical outcomes: an observational study in UK primary and secondary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x709337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren J Scott, Niamh M Redmond, Alison Tavaré, Hannah Little, Seema Srivastava, Anne Pullyblank |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 54% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#687,378
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#293
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,745
of 376,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.