| Title |
Macrolide treatment for COVID-19: Will this be the way forward?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience Trends, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5582/bst.2020.03058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masashi Ohe, Haruki Shida, Satoshi Jodo, Yoshihiro Kusunoki, Masahide Seki, Ken Furuya, Houman Goudarzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 37% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 95% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 319 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 24% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 61 | 19% |
| Unknown | 87 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,290,747
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BioScience Trends
#14
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,793
of 399,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience Trends
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.