| Title |
A Qualitative Study Investigating the Continued Adoption of Breaking Free Online Across a National Substance Misuse Organisation: Theoretical Conceptualisation of Staff Perceptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11414-016-9512-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Dugdale, Sarah Elison, Glyn Davies, Jonathan Ward, Martha Dalton |
| Abstract |
There is evidence for the effectiveness of computer-assisted therapies (CAT) in healthcare; however, implementing CAT can be challenging due to new technologies being perceived as 'disruptive'. This study used normalisation process theory (NPT) to investigate how Breaking Free Online (BFO), a treatment programme for substance misuse, is embedded as normal practice within Crime Reduction Initiatives (CRI), a health and social care charity. Interviews were conducted with CRI staff regarding their perceptions of the normalisation of BFO. Thematic analyses were used and findings structured around NPT. Results suggest that staff understood the benefits of BFO, particularly for those with a dual diagnosis. However, there was some confusion surrounding job roles and difficulties with the availability of resources. Whilst normalisation of BFO is progressing within CRI, there are still some challenges. Clarification of the roles of staff and peer mentors is an area in which further work is being conducted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Librarian | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,385,073
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#197
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,546
of 338,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.