| Title |
Prediction of postoperative pain using path analysis in older patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00540-011-1249-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sakura Kinjo, Laura P. Sands, Eunjung Lim, Sudeshna Paul, Jacqueline M. Leung |
| Abstract |
Effective postoperative pain management is important for older surgical patients because pain affects perioperative outcomes. A prospective cohort study was conducted to describe the direct and indirect effects of patient risk factors and pain treatment in explaining levels of postoperative pain in older surgical patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,912,452
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#144
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,574
of 139,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.