| Title |
The Imperfect Cytokine Storm Severe COVID-19 With ARDS in a Patient on Durable LVAD Support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Case Reports, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinh Q. Chau, Estefania Oliveros, Kiran Mahmood, Aditi Singhvi, Anuradha Lala, Noah Moss, Umesh Gidwani, Donna M. Mancini, Sean P. Pinney, Aditya Parikh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 25% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 18% |
| Scientists | 17 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#710,371
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#56
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,719
of 400,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#8
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.