| Title |
Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2459-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annika Reintam Blaser, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Joel Starkopf, Sonja Fruhwald, Stephan M. Jakob, Jan De Waele, Jan-Peter Braun, Martijn Poeze, Claudia Spies |
| Abstract |
Acute gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and failure have been increasingly recognized in critically ill patients. The variety of definitions proposed in the past has led to confusion and difficulty in comparing one study to another. An international working group convened to standardize the definitions for acute GI failure and GI symptoms and to review the therapeutic options. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 290 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 88 | 29% |
| Unknown | 59 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,857,548
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,514
of 5,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,078
of 250,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.