↓ Skip to main content

Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With the…

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
751 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
685 Mendeley
Title
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With the Guidelines®-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association in Collaboration with the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Respiratory Care, American College of Emergency Physicians, The Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists, and American Society of Anesthesiologists: Supporting Organizations: American Association of Critical Care Nurses and National EMS Physicians
Published in
Circulation, April 2020
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.120.047463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana P. Edelson, Comilla Sasson, Paul S. Chan, Dianne L. Atkins, Khalid Aziz, Lance B. Becker, Robert A. Berg, Steven M. Bradley, Steven C. Brooks, Adam Cheng, Marilyn Escobedo, Gustavo E. Flores, Saket Girotra, Antony Hsu, Beena D. Kamath-Rayne, Henry C. Lee, Rebecca E. Lehotsky, Mary E. Mancini, Raina M. Merchant, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Ashish R. Panchal, Mary Ann R. Peberdy, Tia T. Raymond, Brian Walsh, David S. Wang, Carolyn M. Zelop, Alexis A. Topjian, Monique Anderson Starks, Bentley J. Bobrow, Melissa Chan, Katherine Berg, Jonathan P. Duff, Benny L. Joyner, Javier J. Lasa, Arielle Levy, Melissa Mahgoub, Michael F. O’Connor, Amber V. Hoover, Amber J. Rodriguez, Garth Meckler, Kathryn Roberts, Nicholas M. Mohr, Boulos Nassar, Lewis Rubinson, Robert M. Sutton, Stephen M. Schexnayder, Monica Kleinman, Allan de Caen, Ryan Morgan, Farhan Bhanji, Susan Fuchs, Mark Terry, Mary McBride, Michael Levy, Jose G. Cabanas, David K. Tan, Vivek K. Moitra, Joseph W. Szokol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 751 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 685 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 685 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 12%
Student > Bachelor 73 11%
Other 72 11%
Student > Master 62 9%
Student > Postgraduate 48 7%
Other 118 17%
Unknown 233 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 266 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 84 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Psychology 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1%
Other 51 7%
Unknown 251 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 775. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#25,460
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#99
of 21,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,167
of 402,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#3
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.