↓ Skip to main content

Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
850 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Roff, Peter J. Mumby

Abstract

The great sensitivity of coral reefs to climate change has raised concern over their resilience. An emerging body of resilience theory stems largely from research carried out in a single biogeographic region; the Caribbean. Such geographic bias raises the question of transferability of concepts among regions. In this article, we identify factors that might predispose the Caribbean to its low resilience, including faster rates of macroalgal growth, higher rates of algal recruitment, basin-wide iron-enrichment of algal growth from aeolian dust, a lack of acroporid corals, lower herbivore biomass and missing groups of herbivores. Although mechanisms of resilience are likely to be ubiquitous, our analysis suggests that Indo-Pacific reefs would have to be heavily degraded to exhibit bistability or undergo coral-macroalgal phase shifts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Mexico 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 801 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 171 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 148 17%
Researcher 137 16%
Student > Bachelor 113 13%
Other 40 5%
Other 140 16%
Unknown 101 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 378 44%
Environmental Science 225 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 2%
Unspecified 13 2%
Other 49 6%
Unknown 122 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,191,334
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,687
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,590
of 179,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.