↓ Skip to main content

Occurrence of residual water within disk-based solid-phase extraction and its effect on GC-MS measurement of organic extracts of environmental samples

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Occurrence of residual water within disk-based solid-phase extraction and its effect on GC-MS measurement of organic extracts of environmental samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00216-011-5659-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Erger, Peter Balsaa, Friedrich Werres, Torsten C. Schmidt

Abstract

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is a widespread and powerful sample preparation technique in many analytical areas. Many of the used methods reduce residual water during sample preparation by drying the phase material. Despite the importance of this step, hardly any study deals specifically with the drying process, and if so, only few aspects are mentioned. The present study is the first systematic investigation of the drying process using SPE disks, including the influence of process parameters on the amount of residual water and its consequences for subsequent elution and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The following points were investigated in detail: (1) the change of pressure and volume flow during the drying process, (2) the remaining amount of water at different drying times for different SPE materials, (3) the influence of suspended particulate matter on the drying process and (4) the effects of the residual water on the elution step by using different organic solvents. The study shows that the volume of residual water in the SPE disk is affected by the fixation of the sorbent, the phase material, the amount of sorbent, the pumping settings and the duration of the drying process. Furthermore, systematic investigations demonstrate the influence of residual water on the GC-MS analysis and show analytical interferences only for a few of the investigated analytes. All results suggest that more problems in SPE GC-MS methods are caused by residual water than previously assumed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,473,281
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,314
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,529
of 249,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#52
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.