| Title |
Self-Management Support to People with Type 2 Diabetes - A comparative study of Kaiser Permanente and the Danish Healthcare System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michaela Schiøtz, Martin Strandberg-Larsen, Anne Frølich, Allan Krasnik, Jim Bellows, Jette K Kristensen, Peter Vedsted, Peter Eskildsen, Henning Beck-Nielsen, John Hsu |
| Abstract |
Self-management support is considered to be an essential part of diabetes care. However, the implementation of self-management support within healthcare settings has appeared to be challenging and there is increased interest in "real world" best practice examples to guide policy efforts. In order to explore how different approaches to diabetes care and differences in management structure influence the provision of SMS we selected two healthcare systems that have shown to be comparable in terms of budget, benefits and entitlements. We compared the extent of SMS provided and the self-management behaviors of people living with diabetes in Kaiser Permanente (KP) and the Danish Healthcare System (DHS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,288,782
of 24,024,220 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,937
of 8,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,452
of 169,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#58
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,024,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.