| Title |
Effects of Extra-Fine Inhaled and Oral Corticosteroids on Alveolar Nitric Oxide in COPD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lung, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00408-012-9378-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip M. Short, Peter A. Williamson, Brian J. Lipworth |
| Abstract |
Alveolar nitric oxide (CA(NO)) has been suggested as a surrogate marker of distal airway inflammation in COPD. Coarse particle-inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been shown not to suppress CA(NO). We evaluated whether extra-fine particle size ICS (HFA-BDP) or systemic oral corticosteroids could suppress CA(NO) in COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 51% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#655
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,570
of 156,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.