↓ Skip to main content

HDX Workbench: Software for the Analysis of H/D Exchange MS Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
HDX Workbench: Software for the Analysis of H/D Exchange MS Data
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13361-012-0419-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce D. Pascal, Scooter Willis, Janelle L. Lauer, Rachelle R. Landgraf, Graham M. West, David Marciano, Scott Novick, Devrishi Goswami, Michael J. Chalmers, Patrick R. Griffin

Abstract

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is an established method for the interrogation of protein conformation and dynamics. While the data analysis challenge of HDX-MS has been addressed by a number of software packages, new computational tools are needed to keep pace with the improved methods and throughput of this technique. To address these needs, we report an integrated desktop program titled HDX Workbench, which facilitates automation, management, visualization, and statistical cross-comparison of large HDX data sets. Using the software, validated data analysis can be achieved at the rate of generation. The application is available at the project home page http://hdx.florida.scripps.edu .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 30%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 27%
Chemistry 32 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Engineering 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,475,579
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#106
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,352
of 181,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.