↓ Skip to main content

The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring
Published in
BJGP Open, April 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hashim Al-Gailani, Puneet Chadha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,360,759
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#311
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,278
of 370,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.