| Title |
Restructuring Structural Heart Disease Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic JACC Review Topic of the Week
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine J Chung, Tamim M Nazif, Mariusz Wolbinski, Emad Hakemi, Mark Lebehn, Russell Brandwein, Carolina Pinheiro Rezende, James Doolittle, Leroy Rabbani, Nir Uriel, Allan Schwartz, Angelo Biviano, Elaine Wan, Lisa Hathaway, Rebecca Hahn, Omar Khalique, Nadira Hamid, Vivian Ng, Amisha Patel, Torsten Vahl, Ajay Kirtane, Vinayak Bapat, Isaac George, Martin B Leon, Susheel K Kodali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 33% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 21% |
| Scientists | 16 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#524,046
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,313
of 16,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,613
of 402,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#32
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.