You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Introduction: Fake News, Science, and the Growing Multiplicity and Duplicity of Information Sources
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annual Review of Public Health, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1146/annurev-pu-41-012720-100001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lawrence W Green, Ross C Brownson, Jonathan E Fielding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 23% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,796,889
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Public Health
#425
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,298
of 371,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Public Health
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.