Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessment of neuromuscular block at the orbicularis oris, corrugator supercilii, and adductor pollicis muscles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00540-011-1262-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuhji Saitoh, Hiroshi Sashiyama, Tsutomu Oshima, Yoshinori Nakata, Jiro Sato |
Abstract |
We studied neuromuscular block at the orbicularis oris, corrugator supercilii, and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Philosophy | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,830,855
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#101
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,768
of 141,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.