Title |
A Dual‐mobility Cup Reduces Risk of Dislocation in Isolated Acetabular Revisions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2428-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberto Civinini, Christian Carulli, Fabrizio Matassi, Lorenzo Nistri, Massimo Innocenti |
Abstract |
Isolated acetabular revisions using standard cups are at risk of dislocation. The introduction of a nonconstrained dual-mobility cup was designed to improve prosthetic stability without increasing loosening rates, but it is unclear whether the risk of dislocation is reduced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 53% |
Engineering | 11 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Materials Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,875,368
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,850
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,577
of 179,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#22
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.