↓ Skip to main content

Hydra: A mixture modeling framework for subtyping pediatric cancer cohorts using multimodal gene expression signatures

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydra: A mixture modeling framework for subtyping pediatric cancer cohorts using multimodal gene expression signatures
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Pfeil, Lauren M. Sanders, Ioannis Anastopoulos, A. Geoffrey Lyle, Alana S. Weinstein, Yuanqing Xue, Andrew Blair, Holly C. Beale, Alex Lee, Stanley G. Leung, Phuong T. Dinh, Avanthi Tayi Shah, Marcus R. Breese, W. Patrick Devine, Isabel Bjork, Sofie R. Salama, E. Alejandro Sweet-Cordero, David Haussler, Olena Morozova Vaske

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,405,417
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,349
of 9,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,469
of 401,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#108
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.