You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of a Telephone-Delivered Intervention for Physical Activity and Diet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Graves, Adrian G. Barnett, Kate A. Halton, Jacob L. Veerman, Elisabeth Winkler, Neville Owen, Marina M. Reeves, Alison Marshall, Elizabeth Eakin |
| Abstract |
Given escalating rates of chronic disease, broad-reach and cost-effective interventions to increase physical activity and improve dietary intake are needed. The cost-effectiveness of a Telephone Counselling intervention to improve physical activity and diet, targeting adults with established chronic diseases in a low socio-economic area of a major Australian city was examined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 195 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,171,128
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84,732
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,213
of 92,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#243
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.