↓ Skip to main content

Insights into the pathophysiology of DFNA10 hearing loss associated with novel EYA4 variants

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights into the pathophysiology of DFNA10 hearing loss associated with novel EYA4 variants
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-63256-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matias Morín, Lucía Borreguero, Kevin T Booth, María Lachgar, Patrick Huygen, Manuela Villamar, Fernando Mayo, Luis Carlos Barrio, Luciana Santos Serrão de Castro, Carmelo Morales, Ignacio del Castillo, Beatriz Arellano, Dolores Tellería, Richard J. H. Smith, Hela Azaiez, M. A. Moreno Pelayo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,604,607
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#79,268
of 125,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,112
of 373,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,386
of 3,648 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,648 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.