You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero‐flow stream gage readings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wat2.1436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret A. Zimmer, Kendra E. Kaiser, Joanna R. Blaszczak, Samuel C. Zipper, John C. Hammond, Ken M. Fritz, Katie H. Costigan, Jacob Hosen, Sarah E. Godsey, George H. Allen, Stephanie Kampf, Ryan M. Burrows, Corey A. Krabbenhoft, Walter Dodds, Rebecca Hale, Julian D. Olden, Margaret Shanafield, Amanda G. DelVecchia, Adam S. Ward, Meryl C. Mims, Thibault Datry, Michael T. Bogan, Kate S. Boersma, Michelle H. Busch, C. Nathan Jones, Amy J. Burgin, Daniel C. Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 38% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 59% |
| Scientists | 32 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#775,296
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#31
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,311
of 403,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.