↓ Skip to main content

Untested assumptions about within-species sample size and missing data in interspecific studies

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Untested assumptions about within-species sample size and missing data in interspecific studies
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00265-012-1370-z
Authors

László Zsolt Garamszegi, Anders Pape Møller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 73%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2,492
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,947
of 167,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.