↓ Skip to main content

Human cortical connectome reconstruction from diffusion weighted MRI: The effect of tractography algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human cortical connectome reconstruction from diffusion weighted MRI: The effect of tractography algorithm
Published in
NeuroImage, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Bastiani, Nadim Jon Shah, Rainer Goebel, Alard Roebroeck

Abstract

Reconstructing the macroscopic human cortical connectome by Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) is a challenging research topic that has recently gained a lot of attention. In the present work, we investigate the effects of intra-voxel fiber direction modeling and tractography algorithm on derived structural network indices (e.g. density, small-worldness and global efficiency). The investigation is centered on three semi-independent distinctions within the large set of available diffusion models and tractography methods: i) single fiber direction versus multiple directions in the intra-voxel diffusion model, ii) deterministic versus probabilistic tractography and iii) local versus global measure-of-fit of the reconstructed fiber trajectories. The effect of algorithm and parameter choice has two components. First, there is the large effect of tractography algorithm and parameters on global network density, which is known to strongly affect graph indices. Second, and more importantly, there are remaining effects on graph indices which range in the tens of percent even when global density is controlled for. This is crucial for the sensitivity of any human structural network study and for the validity of study comparisons. We then investigate the effect of the choice of tractography algorithm on sensitivity and specificity of the resulting connections with a connectome dissection quality control (QC) approach. In this approach, evaluation of Tract Specific Density Coefficients (TSDCs) measures sensitivity while careful inspection of tractography path results assesses specificity. We use this to discuss interactions in the combined effects of these methods and implications for future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 7 3%
United States 6 2%
Netherlands 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Spain 4 1%
Canada 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 238 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 26%
Researcher 70 26%
Student > Master 38 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 16%
Neuroscience 42 15%
Engineering 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Computer Science 26 9%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 54 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,273,297
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#2,816
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,133
of 180,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#19
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.