↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative Evaluation of Participation and Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy vs Fecal Immunochemical Test vs Risk-Adapted Screening in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Interim Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (TARGET-C).
Published in
American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2020
DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongda Chen, Ming Lu, Chengcheng Liu, Shuangmei Zou, Lingbin Du, Xianzhen Liao, Dong Dong, Donghua Wei, Yi Gao, Chen Zhu, Liming Zhu, Weifang Zheng, Haifan Xiao, Yunxin Kong, Huiping Yin, Hai Zhou, Rongbiao Ying, Baoquan Wang, Juan Zhang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yuhan Zhang, Hong Wang, Lanwei Guo, Li Liu, Jiansong Ren, Jufang Shi, Ni Li, Xiaoping Miao, Hermann Brenner, Min Dai

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#1,977,678
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#1,223
of 9,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,141
of 432,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#17
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.