↓ Skip to main content

Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards
Published in
Animal Cognition, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0522-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Bramlett, Bonnie M. Perdue, Theodore A. Evans, Michael J. Beran

Abstract

Self-control is defined as foregoing an immediate reward to gain a larger delayed reward. Methods used to test self-control comparatively include inter-temporal choice tasks, delay of gratification tasks, and accumulation tasks. To date, capuchin monkeys have shown different levels of self-control across tasks. This study introduced a new task that could be used comparatively to measure self-control in an intuitive context that involved responses that required no explicit training. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were given a choice between two food items that were presented on a mechanized, revolving tray that moved those foods sequentially toward the monkeys. A monkey could grab the first item or wait for the second, but was only allowed one item. Most monkeys in the study waited for a more highly preferred food item or a larger amount of the same food item when those came later, and they inhibited the prepotent response to grab food by not reaching out to take less-preferred foods or smaller amounts of food that passed directly in front of them first. These data confirm that the mechanisms necessary for self-control are present in capuchin monkeys and indicate that the methodology can be useful for broader comparative assessments of self-control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,058,867
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#565
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,609
of 181,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.