You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elements of morphology: Standard terminology for the head and face
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ajmg.a.32612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith E. Allanson, Christopher Cunniff, H. Eugene Hoyme, Julie McGaughran, Max Muenke, Giovanni Neri |
| Abstract |
An international group of clinicians working in the field of dysmorphology has initiated the standardization of terms used to describe human morphology. The goals are to standardize these terms and reach consensus regarding their definitions. In this way, we will increase the utility of descriptions of the human phenotype and facilitate reliable comparisons of findings among patients. Discussions with other workers in dysmorphology and related fields, such as developmental biology and molecular genetics, will become more precise. Here we introduce the anatomy of the craniofacies and define and illustrate the terms that describe the major characteristics of the cranium and face. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 228 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 69 | 28% |
| Unknown | 42 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,141,700
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#362
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,391
of 183,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.