↓ Skip to main content

Deprescribing medication in very elderly patients with multimorbidity: the view of Dutch GPs. A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 2,359)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Deprescribing medication in very elderly patients with multimorbidity: the view of Dutch GPs. A qualitative study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Schuling, Henkjan Gebben, Leonardus Johannes Gerardus Veehof, Flora Marcia Haaijer-Ruskamp

Abstract

Elderly patients with multimorbidity who are treated according to guidelines use a large number of drugs. This number of drugs increases the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Stopping medication may relieve these effects, and thereby improve the patient's wellbeing. To facilitate management of polypharmacy expert-driven instruments have been developed, sofar with little effect on the patient's quality of life. Recently, much attention has been paid to shared decision-making in general practice, mainly focusing on patient preferences. This study explores how experienced GPs feel about deprescribing medication in older patients with multimorbidity and to what extent they involve patients in these decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 283 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 17%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 63 22%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Psychology 13 4%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 78 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#542,949
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#17
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,612
of 177,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.