↓ Skip to main content

From neuroimaging to patients’ bench: what we have learnt from trigemino-autonomic pain syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
From neuroimaging to patients’ bench: what we have learnt from trigemino-autonomic pain syndromes
Published in
Neurological Sciences, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10072-012-1051-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Leone, Alberto Proietti Cecchini, Angelo Franzini, Giuseppe Messina, Gennaro Bussone

Abstract

Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are primary headaches including cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT). A number of neuroimaging studies have been conducted in last decade showing involvement of brain areas included in the pain matrix. Apart from pain matrix involvement, other neuroimaging findings data deserve special attention. The hypothalamic activation reported in the course of TAC attacks coupled with the efficacy of hypothalamic neurostimulation to treat drug-resistant TAC forms clearly indicate the posterior hypothalamus as a crucial area in TAC pathophysiology. In animal models this brain area has been shown to modulate craniofacial pain; moreover, hypothalamic activation occurs in other pain conditions, suggesting that posterior hypothalamus has a more complex role in TAC pathophysiology rather than simply being considered as a trigger. In contrast, hypothalamic activation may serve as a crucial area in terminating rather than triggering attacks. It also could lead to a central condition facilitating initiation of TAC attacks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Psychology 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%