Title |
Understanding Transitions in Care from Hospital to Homeless Shelter: a Mixed-Methods, Community-Based Participatory Approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2117-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Ryan Greysen, Rebecca Allen, Georgina I. Lucas, Emily A. Wang, Marjorie S. Rosenthal |
Abstract |
Coordinated transitions from hospital to shelter for homeless patients may improve outcomes, yet patient-centered data to guide interventions are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 56% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
Scientists | 7 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
Researcher | 27 | 16% |
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 35 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
Psychology | 13 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 42 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,113,940
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#909
of 8,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,318
of 153,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.