↓ Skip to main content

Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture and Human Values, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern Thailand
Published in
Agriculture and Human Values, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10460-012-9378-6
Authors

Pepijn Schreinemachers, Iven Schad, Prasnee Tipraqsa, Pakakrong M. Williams, Andreas Neef, Suthathip Riwthong, Walaya Sangchan, Christian Grovermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 24%
Researcher 28 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 14%
Social Sciences 16 14%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,612,318
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#413
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,239
of 169,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.